Implications of computer-based projects in electronics on fostering independent learning, creativity and teamwork

ABSTRACT

This research aimed to explore the impact of computer-based projects, within the framework of high school electronics studies, on pupils' learning. Technology studies provide a sophisticated learning environment in which computers are simultaneously part of the subject matter learned and a means for teaching and learning. In the beginning stages, pupils highly depend on teachers' instructions and help. Pupils working on non-computerized projects in electronics are likely to progress along a conventional path: planning, constructing, troubleshooting and improving. In contrast, pupils working on computer-based projects tend to modify their systems, drift away from the initial design suggested by the teacher, take risks, improvise and make progress through trial and error. Computerized projects impart flexibility, freedom of action and independence to the pupils beyond that usually found at school. Computerized projects encourage cooperation and teamwork among pupils through the Internet. Under "Internet culture," pupils quickly zip between sources of information, download programs from different sources and exchange ideas with friends. New ideas, especially regarding computer programming, are distributed among the pupils, developed and refined, and become common property. Computerized projects encourage pupils to cross the line from fully teacher-guided work and become confident and independent learners.

References

1. Barak, M., & Doppelt, Y. (2000). Using portfolio to enhance creative thinking. The Journal of Technology Studies, 26(2), 16--25.
2. Barak, M. (2002). Learning good electronics, or coping with challenging tasks? Priorities of excellent students. Journal of Technology Education, 14(2), 20--34.
3. Bogdan, R. C., & Bilken, S. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education: an introduction to theory and methods (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
4. Brown, J., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32--42.
5. Circuit Maker. Available at: http://www.microcode.com/ Accessed: November, 2003.
6. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1997). The jasper project: Lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins.
8. Dasgupta, D. (1996). Technology and creativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Dewey, J. (1963). The child and the curriculum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10. Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York: The Free Press.
11. Dugger, W. E (2001) Standards for technological literacy. Phi Delta Kapan 82(7), March, 513--517.
12. Electronic Workbench. Available at: http://www.interactiv.com/ Accessed: November, 2003.
13. Guba, E. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Ed), Handbook of qualitative research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 105--117.
14. Harman, W. & Rheingold, H. (1984). Higher creativity. Los Angeles: JP Tarcher
15. Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1998). Reward, intrinsic motivation, and creativity. American Psychologist, 53, 674--675.
16. International Technology Education Association (ITEA) (2000). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology, Reston, VA: Author.
17. Johnson, S. D. (1997). Learning technological concepts and developing intellectual skills. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7, 161--180.
18. Jonassen, D., Peck, K., & Wilson, B. (2000). Learning with technology: A constructivist approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19. Kafai, Y. B. & Resnick, M. (1996) Introduction. In Y. B. Kafai, & M. Resnick, (eds) Constructionism in practice -- designing, thinking and learning in a digital world. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 1--8.
20. Krajcik, J. S., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (1994). A Collaborative model for helping middle-grade science teachers learn project-based instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 94, 483--497.
21. Milrad, M. (2002). Using construction kits, modeling tools and system dynamics simulations to support collaborative discovery learning, Educational Technology & Society 5(4).
22. Papert, S. (1991). Situating constructionism. In I. Harel, & S. Papert (Ed.) Constructionism. Norwood, N. J.: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
23. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24. Pspice. Available at: http://www.orcadpcb.com/pspice/ Accessed: November, 2003.
25. Salomon, G. (1998). Novel constructivist learning environments and novel technologies: Some issues to be considered. Research Dialog in Learning and Instruction, 1(1), 3--12.
26. Salomon, G., Perkins, D. N. & Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies. Educational Researcher, 20(3), 2--9.
27. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Engaging students in a knowledge society. Educational Leadership, 54, 6--10.
28. Solomon, J. (2000). The Changing perspectives of constructivism: Science wars and children creativity, in: D. C. Philips, (Ed.), Constructivism in education, opinions and second opinions on controversial issues, The Ninety-ninth Yearbook of The National Society for the Study of Education, Part I, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 283--307.
29. Spectrum Software. Available at: http://www.spectrum-soft.com/index.shtm. Accessed: November, 2003.
30. Sternberg, R. J. (Ed) (1999). Handbook of creativity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press,
31. Von Glaserfeldt, E. (1989) Constructivism in education. In: T. Husen, & N. Postlethwaite (Ed.), the International Encyclopedia of Education, (pp. 162--163). Oxford, UK: Pergamon, 11--12.

• Applied computing